answer the following questions 188

CTA 7: Kaizen at San Francisco General Hospital.
Links to short news items and video about SF General’s initiative to adopt Kaizen to improve its operations and the challenges it still faces along its journey. Staff members at SF General employed Kaizen in areas such as reducing patients’ average wheels-in to incision time to shaving average wait time in its Urgent Care unit. These improvement efforts, while commendable, did not eliminate errors completely. Ironically, around the same time Kaizen implementation at SF General Hospital was reported, another news broke about that SF General lost a female patient for two weeks, and she was eventually found dead in a hospital stairway.)
News Item 1: S.F. General following ‘Toyota Way’ to efficiency (clicking this link will download the item as a PDF file)
News Item 2 (includes video): Body of Missing Woman Found at San Francisco General Hospital Links to an external site. (Links to an external site)
Critically analyze the information contained in news article and the video. Then write well-thought out answers to the questions below:

Why are hospitals, such as San Francisco General Hospital, adopting the ‘Toyota Way’?
Which of the many Japanese terms (listed in the Glossary provided in News Item 1) could have prevented the lost patient? Explain the rationale of your choice(s).

Rubric
Critical Thinking Rubric.

Critical Thinking Rubric.

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies and Summarizes issue at hand

5.0 pts
Identifies not only the basics of the issue, but recognizes nuances of the issue

4.0 pts
Identifies the main issue and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the issue

2.0 pts
Does not identify and summarize the issue, is confused or identifies a different or inappropriate issue

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal and other salient perspectives and positions

5.0 pts
Addresses and analyzes salient perspectives from experience and information from outside sources.

4.0 pts
Identifies, appropriately, one’s own position and/or other salient perspectives on the issue

3.0 pts
Address a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own and/or other salient perspective

2.0 pts
Fails to address even a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify presented position relative to one’s own and/or other salient perspective

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of evaluation and analysis

5.0 pts
Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences. Clearly distinguishes between fact, opinion, and acknowledges value judgments

4.0 pts
Examines the evidence and source of evidence, questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, and completeness

2.0 pts
Merely repeats information provided, taking it as truth or denies evidence without adequate justification

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions, implications, and consequences

5.0 pts
Objectively reflects upon own assertions

4.0 pts
Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences

3.0 pts
Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences but only superficially

2.0 pts
Fails to identify conclusions, implications, and consequences of the issue

5.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post answer the following questions 188 appeared first on Essay Writers.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!