To support your work, use your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format. Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates. For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice. The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam. Here you can view information on how to access and navigate iHuman. This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Dianne Steinberg VE”. After completing your iHuman Case Study, answer the following questions: What is your list of appropriate differential diagnoses and why? What is the final diagnosis and what assessment findings serve to support this? What are the specific auscultation, palpation, and percussion findings of the lungs that are normal vs. abnormal?

Critically review and respond to the following statement:

The strengths-based nursing care approach can complement the problem based (medical model) approach to healthcare currently evident in Australian healthcare system.

Key point is:

Family engagement in person centered care

family engagement improves patient’s outcomes; getting feedback on our work; family are not only relative, also communities;

1. Person-centered & Family-centered not just relationship (community-significant others)

2. Establishing family background, dynamic

3. Key people involved, what resources they have; Increasing improvement in patient empowering resources for family

4. Identify family trimer

5. Weakness compare with the sbn

Be strong-family engagement, how employment; Ongoing capacity

Think family resources- who are they involved; verbal & non-verbal/supporting

Shorter time admission, less cost, supporting the patient; Statement: family engagement reduces admission time;

Criteria
Demonstrates understanding of the Strengths based nursing care (SBNC) approach (30%) Analyses and validates: – concepts of SBNC, – the role of the nurse SBNC.
Demonstrates understanding of patient and family outcomes (30%) Analyses and validates:- SBNC relationship to health & wellbeing outcomes- implications across the lifespan,- how strengths and health outcomes bidirectionally interact.
Provides examples of Strengths-based nursing care that complements a medical model of healthcare (20%) Examples used clearly and practically demonstrates:- a strong understanding of the medical model and how it can be enhanced by SBNC approaches.
Maintain academic standards (20%) – Referencing requirements, spelling, grammar and punctuation are without flaw – Paper is skilfully constructed and a pleasure to read

Gottlieb, L. N 2013. Strengths-based nursing care: Health and healing for persons and family. Springer, New York.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!